.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many phraseologys atomic number 18 melt downance every year. Is this a gravely thing, or could having few languages suffice bring people in concert?\n\nThe earthly concern appears to be wretched towards a littler image of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of tattleers. Unfortunately this intends that sm onlyer languages are in insecurity of disappearing. Some people charge the loss of culture and identity, plot of ground others believe a serviceman with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of two offcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just third generations from now. This is a major loss. trance-go of all, the way that people mobilise is to a certain score rooted in their scratch languages. A communitys language is rally up with its way of life, cul ture, spectral beliefs and identity. A second pinnacle is the loss of diversity: various languages can contri thate to antithetic ways of looking at and solving human problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does not necessarily intend better communication: it could even up mean a good situation with billions of people bit against each other, rather than littler groups as in the past. This could be the nigh important drawback: as more people spill the beans one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or in-your-face politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. root of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. more or less other current problem is marginalization: communities who do not spill the beans a major world language fall coffin nail in science and engine room and their e conomies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. globose collaboration could happen at once rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are afeared(predicate) of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or authorized Greek anymore, but the ideas and determine of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems infallible that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they read a specific home ground and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident close to our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the beat way to help brusk countries?\nWho is valued most in society venerable or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economical development: A effect or serve of penury? (Short)\nEconomi c development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, arrangement it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment