Compare and contrast the treatment of dogs in ‘To Flush my Dog’ and the RSPCA leaflet

To gush, My mouse click scripted by Elizabeth Barrett Browning and the RSPCA brochure Just 3 a month go out help rescue more animals care Trio ar both documents exploring the same topic treatment of tags. Both documents depict how the possessors treat their drop backs other than showing the love life and bond amid dogs and humans. In To take down, My Dog, Elizabeth appraises her dog in a very elaborated manner, while RSPCA documents look at animals from a nonher perspective. Though the theme is the same, the draw a bead on of writing is very different. Elizabeths love for her dog is line of worked with the maltreatment by virtually owners whose dogs are later rescued by RSPCA. Similarities, differences and impacts of such treatments will be discussed.Nevermore, to pat thee (Stanza 16, rake 6) Elizabeth utilizes archaic words like thee and thy to emphasize the importance of run to her. Their cozy relationship is shown through physical affection like patting and stroking. However, there is not any physical affection between Trio and its owner. Trio was physically abused. It was squeezed and grabbed in the belly. The wound is so serious that the owner has been prosecuted and is banned from kick animals for five years. Readers burn down be easily moved by such violent scenes.Elizabeth provides heyday with a cozy home. She takes good distribute of it, feeds it with sugared milk and gives it some pretty collars to wear. Similarly, the staff in RSPCA handle the detestably injured and physically abused dogs with devoted care approximately the clock, hoping that they would recover as soon as possible. This shows the provision of love and care by dog lovers beyond basic necessities such as forage and shelter. However, Poppy and Trio are not as fortunate as Flush. As she swept along the drain pipe, saved it from certain destruction (Poppys story, line 10) elaborates the miserable fate of Poppy or other disastrous dogs. Poppy is not even p rovided with a proper home. It was rescued by the owners neighbor when she swept along the drain pipe.In To Flush, My Dog, readers are bewildered to see such a beautiful and agreeable dog which understands its owner. Fawning, fondling, breathing fast (stanza 11, line 4) is an alliteration used to describe that Flush is a caring and affectionate dog. This creates a drumming effect to make readers prudence on how pleasing and attentive Flush is. No man break thy purple cup (stanza 17, line 5) is a metaphor used to show how loyal Flush is to its owner. Purple is the colorize of loyalty. No man is used to describe the indispensable role of Flush.Nobody can replace his role. It alludes Flush is very loyal to its owner and it is the best assistant to her. Repetition of the word benediction, which means blessing, is used in the theodolite to emphasize that Elizabeth feels very blessed to have such a loving friend. This is reinforced by Mock I thee, in wishing weal? which reiterates that Flush is a true blessing to her.This makes a big contrast to the treatment of Trio reported in the RSPCA leaflet, where its irresponsible owner steadfast it against a cupboard with full force just because it made a mess in the bedroom. The first paragraph in Trios Story successfully grasps readers interest on why Trios owner saw red.The reaction of the dogs in these dickens passages was withal very different. Flush is a caring and loyal dog. It sits beside the writer when she is regurgitate. quite a than playing with other dogs, it stays with its owner. Flush is considerate and thoughtful that it conveniences the owner when she cries. It trusts its owner. This alludes again the mutual love and affection between Flush and Elizabeth. On the contrary, Trio crawled away from its owner and hid under a fingerstall after his owner smashed him against a cupboard. This suggests how ruthless the owner is and how sick their relation is.The purpose of writing these both documents i s very different. To Flush, My Dog is written to show appreciation to dogs and it shows that Flush is a true blessing to her. However, the RSPCA leaflet is written to appeal for donation provided with two convincing and touching stories. This is do by the inspectors candid attempt to convey the message. lamb Friend (first line in the letter) is what the inspector addresses the potential donors andgeneral public. This successfully triggers emotions and thoughts from the readers since some atomic number 53 they dont know is directly addressed in a friendly manner.The structures of the two poems are very different. To Flush, My Dog is a poem with rhyming words in the first two lines and 4th, fifth lines in every stanza. There are a total of 20 stanzas with six lines each. Examples of rhymes are plenty, like brown, breast, rest in the second stanza and height, channelise, line and thine in the last stanza. In the RSPCA leaflet, there are two touching stories of physically tortured do gs-Trio and Poppy and a letter from the inspector of RSPCA with an aim to appeal donation for helping the poor animals. The structure is modern English.Both documents use a lot of emotive and convincing language. In just one year we rescued 6982 abused and pretermit animals. The use of figures and emotive languages neglected, abused successfully are deployed to arouse readers attention and sympathy. It also allows readers to realize the seriousness of the situation. Other words like struggle, neglected, abused, terribly injured are also used to emphasize the suffering of the dogs like Trio and Poppy, and thus appeal for help, support and donation for the RSPCA.In the poem To Flush, My Dog, Elizabeth describes her dog as pretty, supportive and benediction, to suggest the mutual love between Flush and Elizabeth. The first stanza Gentle fellow creature is echoed at the end of the poem when it proclaims Loving fellow creature showing the sonority towards her fellow.Both To Flush, M y Dog and the RSPCA leaflet articulate the love and bond between human and dogs, which is shown by Elizabeth and inspector respectively. Elizabeths close relationship with Flush is contrasted by the ruthless ones of Trios and Poppys. The structure and the style of these two documents differs to a great extent but the use of language shows some similarities. The greatest similarities are the writers excellent ways of articulating their ideas and to influence the readers.